Linitis plastica: current prognostic implication of a classic concept.

BACKGROUND: Despite having been described for several centuries linitis plastica's (LP) prognostic implication remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of LP on the survival of patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. METHOD: A single-center retrospective study of cases of LP diagnosed and confirmed by pathological anatomy has been carried out in a third-level center for 5 years. RESULTS: They were grouped into Linitis Plastica (LP), diffuse non-LP carcinomas (DNLP) and other adenocarcinomas (ADC). 199 gastrectomies performed in the same period of time were included in the comparative analysis. With a median follow-up of 54.5 months (95% CI: 37.0-65.0), the median survival of LP was 14 months (95% CI: 9-27) significantly lower (p = 0.002) compared to DNLP 51.5 months (95% CI: 25-70) and the rest of ADC 62 months (95% CI: 43-68). The OS at 1, 3 and 5 years was statistically worse in the LP group (69, 15, 8%) compared to DNLP (82, 54, 44%) and ADC (89, 63, 54%) (p = 0.073, p <0.001, p <0.001). In the multivariate analysis, LP was identified as an independent risk factor for OS with an HR of 3.26 (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LP is an independent prognostic factor associated with higher mortality in gastric cancer.

ANTECEDENTES: A pesar de haber sido descrita hace varios siglos, sigue sin estar clara la implicación pronóstica de la linitis plástica (LP). OBJETIVO: Analizar el impacto de la LP en la supervivencia de los pacientes intervenidos de gastrectomía por adenocarcinoma gástrico. MÉTODO: Estudio retrospectivo unicéntrico de los casos de LP diagnosticados en nuestro centro durante 5 años. RESULTADOS: Se agruparon en LP, carcinomas difusos no LP (DNLP) y resto de adenocarcinomas (ADC). En el análisis comparativo se incluyeron 199 gastrectomías realizadas en el mismo periodo de tiempo. Con una mediana de seguimiento de 54.5 meses (intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC 95%]: 37.0-65.0), la supervivencia mediana de la LP fue de 14 meses (IC 95%: 9-27), significativamente menor (p = 0.002) que en los DNLP, que fue de 51.5 meses (IC 95%: 25-70), y que en el resto de los ADC, en los que fue de 62 meses (IC 95%: 43-68). La supervivencia global a 1, 3 y 5 años fue estadísticamente peor en el grupo de LP (69, 15 y 8%) comparado con los grupos de DNLP (82, 54 y 44%) y ADC (89, 63 y 54%) (p = 0.073, p < 0.001 y p < 0.001, respectivamente). En el análisis multivariante se identificó la LP como un factor de riesgo independiente de supervivencia (hazard ratio: 3.26; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONES: La LP es un factor pronóstico independiente asociado a mayor mortalidad por cáncer gástrico.

Escudo de Blumer: signo diagnóstico de la diseminación a distancia del cáncer gástrico difuso / Blumer ́s shelf: diagnostic sign of distant spread of diffuse gastric cancer

Introducción. Se conoce como escudo de Blumer al engrosamiento neoplásico del fondo de saco de Douglas, palpable al tacto rectal como una protrusión en forma de resalte, presente en pacientes afectados por carcinomas con infiltración difusa. A pesar de haber sido descrito hace más de un siglo, se trata de un proceso diagnosticado infrecuentemente y con escasa mención en la literatura científica. Es preciso tener un alto nivel de sospecha clínica para correlacionar los síntomas pélvicos con la presencia de un tumor, habitualmente gástrico. Casos clínicos. Presentamos dos pacientes con hallazgo de escudo de Blumer, asociado a cáncer gástrico difuso, uno como diagnóstico primario de enfermedad metastásica y otro como recidiva de la enfermedad, meses después de ser operado. Ambos casos presentan un complejo proceso diagnóstico, en el que prima la sospecha clínica, apoyado sobre pruebas de imagen como tomografía computarizada y resonancia nuclear magnética, ya que tanto las biopsias obtenidas por endoscopia, como las biopsias intraoperatorias fueron negativas. Discusión. En el escudo de Blumer, las células tumorales infiltran el fondo de saco de Douglas de forma difusa por debajo de la serosa, sin necesidad de que existan implantes macroscópicamente visibles en el peritoneo visceral. La infiltración tumoral puede afectar extrínsecamente al recto, causando una estenosis del mismo, lo que produce sintomatología pélvica inespecífica, como tenesmo rectal y proctalgia. Por lo tanto, este ominoso proceso debe ser sospechado en pacientes con sintomatología pélvica, que presenten o hayan presentado cáncer gástrico

Introduction. The neoplastic thickening of the cul-de-sac of Douglas is known as "Blumer's shelf". It is palpable on rectal examination as a protrusion in the form of a projection, and it presents in patients affected by carcinomas with diffuse infiltration. Despite being described more than a century ago, it is a rare process with little mention in the scientific literature. A high level of clinical suspicion is required to correlate pelvic symptoms with the presence of a typically gastric tumor.Clinical cases. We present two patients with a Blumer's shelf finding associated with diffuse gastric cancer, one as a primary diagnosis of metastatic disease and the other as a recurrence of the disease, months after being operated on. Both cases present a complex diagnostic process, in which clinical suspicion prevails, supported by imaging tests such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, since both endoscopic biopsies and intraoperative biopsies were negative.Discussion. In Blumer's shelf, tumor cells infiltrate the cul-de-sac of Douglas in a diffuse and subserous manner, without the need for macroscopically visible implants in the visceral peritoneum. Tumor infiltration can extrinsically affect the rectum, causing its stenosis, which produces nonspecific pelvic symptoms such as rectal tenesmus and proctalgia. Therefore, this ominous process should be suspected in patients with pelvic symptoms, who present or have presented gastric cancer

From Lauren's diffuse gastric cancer to WHO's poorly cohesive carcinoma. Clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics.

INTRODUCTION: since Lauren classified gastric cancer into intestinal-type adenocarcinoma and diffuse gastric carcinoma back in 1965, countless categorizations have been published that attempt to elucidate the clinicopathological and prognostic differences between histological subtypes. OBJECTIVE: a retrospective study was performed of gastric cancer cases managed in a third-level site over ten years in order to compare subtypes between the most widely used classifications (Lauren and World Health Organization [WHO]). METHODS: a comparative study of the most relevant clinicopathological characteristics and a multivariate survival analysis were performed. RESULTS: significant differences exist between histological subtypes in terms of age, gender, location, extension, stage and treatment received. A univariate overall survival analysis revealed better survival rates for intestinal-type adenocarcinoma as compared to diffuse carcinoma (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.405 [1.024-1.927]) according to the Lauren's classification. Furthermore, there was a better prognosis of mucinous carcinoma (HR: 0.378 [0.164-0.868]), though failing to prove a poorer prognosis of poorly cohesive (HR: 1.242 [0.878-1.757]) and signet cell (HR: 1.354 [0.792-2.314]) carcinomas, according to the WHO classification. In the multivariate overall survival analysis, the following poor prognosis factors were identified: male gender, local infiltration (T), nodal invasion (N) and received adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSION: although the various histological subtypes show significant clinicopathological differences, further studies are needed to compare them and clarify the prognostic relevance of each one.

Migración de clip al coledoco tras colecistectomía laparoscópica / Migration of a clip to the common bile duct after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

No disponible

Malformación arteriovenosa pancreática / Pancreatic arteriovenous malformation

No disponible